论文部分内容阅读
研究现状地质构造极其复杂多样的苏联领土,为构造地质的研究开阔了广辟的前景。苏联历来有许多构造地质学派。它们之间存在着原则上的分歧,常常争论很激烈而富于创造性。我们应当支持各种学派的发展,而不能以行政命令方式迫使人们接受某种学术观点。例如在二十年代—三十年代间,苏联有三个非常卓越的学派:M.M.捷佳耶夫(1935)一派主张垂直震荡运动在构造成因中起主要作用;阿·阿·鲍里夏克(1922年)一派拥护阿·魏格纳的大陆漂移学说;安·德·阿尔汉格尔斯基和尼·谢·沙茨基(1933年及其以后)一派坚持经典的地槽学说。二次大战以后,苏联又有两种主要的构造地质学派,分别以弗·弗别洛乌索夫和尼·谢·沙茨基为代表。
Research status The geological structure is extremely complex and diverse Soviet territory, open up broad prospects for the study of tectonic geology. There have always been many tectonic geology schools in the Soviet Union. There is a fundamental disagreement between them and often the arguments are intense and creative. We should support the development of all kinds of schools instead of forcing people to accept certain academic views by way of administrative orders. In the 1920s and 1930s, for example, there were three schools of remarkable excellence in the Soviet Union: one in MMJJyeyev (1935) argued that the vertical oscillating movement played a major role in the genesis of the structure; Ah-Bharijk (1922 Year) faction supported A Weigner’s doctrine of continental drift; Anders Arkhangelski and Nietzsche Schartski (1933 et seq. After World War II, the Soviet Union again has two major tectonic geology, represented by Eph Froulowsov and Nietzsche Schartski respectively.