论文部分内容阅读
对“李约瑟问题”的研究,其最后结论不外乎有二:第一,“李约瑟问题”的确是一个难题,所以,对应有各种解答方案;第二,对“李约瑟问题”进行质疑,其结论可分为“无科学说”、“伪问题说”和“有毛病说”三类,所以,我们首先要对“李约瑟问题”进行修正、扬弃,然后再来解答。此两种方案在实际应用过程中有一个共同的失误:将反事实条件句应用于“李约瑟问题”的分析。从历史主义的视角来考察,“李约瑟问题”作为一个历史问题,首先是一个“假设历史”问题,故不能将反事实条件句应用于其研究过程之中,否则就是一种误用。
The final conclusion of the research on Joseph Needham is nothing more than two. First, “Joseph Needham ” is indeed a problem, so there are solutions for each. Second, “To question, the conclusion can be divided into ” no scientific theory “, ” pseudo-question said “and ” faulty “three categories, therefore, we must first” Needham question “be amended , Discard, and then come back to answer. The two schemes have a common mistake in the practical application process: Apply the counterfactual conditionals to the analysis of ”Needham Problem“. From the perspective of historicalism, ”Joseph Needham“ as a historical issue, first of all, is a question of ”hypothetical history", so the counterfactual conditional sentence can not be applied to its research process, otherwise it is a mistake use.