历史学与史料学的区别、历史材料的局限性以及历史认识活动中主体背景知识的不同说明,历史事实中必然包含着理论解释.但这并不意味着否认历史的客观性,并不意味着历史学家可以随心所欲地解释历史.事实上,历史学家对材料的取舍和对理论解释背景框架的选择,总是与他们所处的那个时代的风尚、学术氛围和他们的认识水平相一致的.自觉地认识到这一点,将有助于促进历史学的繁荣. The difference between history and historical materials, the limitation of historical materials and the different explanations of the subject’s background knowledge in historical cognition activities, the historical facts necessarily contain theoretical explanations. However, this does not mean that denying the objectivity of history does not mean Historians can interpret history as they wish. In fact, the historian’s choice of materials and the contextual framework for the interpretation of theory are always consistent with the style, academic atmosphere and level of awareness of the time they were in Consciously recognizing this will help promote the prosperity of history.