论文部分内容阅读
海德格尔的语言与老子的道存在一定的交融,也存在不同之处。海德格尔认为语言是真正的源始,语言是存在的家,他更多从道自身的特性出发,去分析道、世界万物、人之间的关系;老子则更为关注大道及其特性,主张天人合一,认为自然界自有不变的规律,不可人为改之。老子认为道不可被言说,而海德格尔的道则与语言相统一。
There is some difference between Heidegger’s language and Tao’s existence. Heidegger believes that language is the true source, language is the existence of the home, he more from the characteristics of the Tao itself, to analyze the Tao, the world of all things, the relationship between people; Lao Tzu is more concerned about the road and its characteristics, Advocating the unity of man and nature, that nature has its own laws, can not be artificially changed. I do not think Tao can be said, and Heidegger’s Tao and language are unified.