贵刊1988年第1期陈建华同志一文的表2表明,在调查的38个家庭中双亲全部双眼睑而子代双眼睑数61人,单眼睑数38人。作者苦于它是否符合3:1的分离比例而用卡方检验法。本人认为,这一命题的前提是错误的,因为只有当亲本双方肯定都是杂合体Aa×Aa时,从理论上说子代才会出现3:1这样的分离比例;而实际上双亲全部双眼睑的还有AA×AA和Aa×AA这两种婚 Table 2 in your article No. 1, 1988, by Comrade Chen Jianhua shows that in the surveyed 38 families, all parents had double pairs of eyelids and offspring with 61 pairs of eyelids and 38 with single eyelids. The author suffers from the chi-square test whether it meets the 3: 1 separation ratio. In my opinion, the proposition of this proposition is wrong, because when both parents are definitely hybrid Aa × Aa, theoretically speaking, the offspring will have a separation ratio of 3: 1. In fact, all of the parents are all double The eyelids also AA × AA and Aa × AA these two kinds of marriage