曲普坦类药物相关副作用的评估:方法对结果的影响

来源 :世界核心医学期刊文摘(神经病学分册) | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:zhrmghgws001
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
Background. - A recent study conducted in triptan- na ve migraine patients showed that tolerability was the second most important attribute of an acute treatment. However, the proportion of patients reporting side effects after any acute treatment may vary with regard to the method of assessment. Objectives. - To contrast two methods of assessing adverse events (prompted and unprompted) in those with headache using triptans. Methods. - This study was conducted in two sites, a headache center in the United States, and a neurology office focusing on headache in Italy. We prospectively surveyed 415 adults with headache, who had been using the same triptan for at least 3 months. Participants were asked about their headache and treatment history. Subjects then completed a standardized questionnaire, assessing adverse events in two different ways. First, subjects were asked if they had any adverse events when using the triptan. After returning the first part of the questionnaire, subjects received a second form, where 49 possible adverse events were listed. We contrasted and correlated both sets of answers. Results. - Most patients (U.S. = 74.9% , Italy = 65.5% ) reported no side effects in the unprompted questionnaire. However, most of them (U.S. = 62.9% , Italy = 54.1% ) reported at least one side effect in the prompted questionnaire. Most patients that reported side effects in the unprompted questionnaire said they had just one adverse event, while most reported two or more side effects in the prompted questionnaire. Both in the unprompted and in the prompted questionnaires, most side effects were rated as mild or moderate. Interestingly, 31 (7.5% ) subjects (pooling data from both sites together) graded their adverse events as severe in the prompted questionnaire, but had not self- reported them. Conclusions. - (1) When assessing adverse events, the method of data collection may dramatically influence the results. (2)- From those subjects who did not self- report adverse events after using a triptan, most of them will report positively if presented with a list of side effects. Background. - A recent study conducted in triptan- na ve migraine patients showed that tolerability was the second most important attribute of an acute treatment. However, the proportion of patients reporting side effects after any acute treatment may vary with regard to the method of assessment. Objectives. - To contrast two methods of assessing adverse events (prompted and unprompted) in those with headache using triptans. Methods. - This study was conducted in two sites, a headache center in the United States, and a neurology office focusing on headache in Italy. We prospectively surveyed 415 adults with headache, who had been using the same triptan for at least 3 months. Participants were asked about their headache and treatment history. Subjects then completed a problem questionnaire, assessing adverse events in two different ways. First, subjects were asked if they had any adverse events when using the triptan. After returning the first part of the questionnaire, subjects received a second form, where 49 possible adverse events were listed listed. We contrasted and correlated both sets of answers. Results. - Most patients (US = 74.9%, Italy = 65.5%) reported no side effects in the unprompted questionnaire. However, most of them (US = 62.9%, Italy = 54.1%) reported at least one side effect in the prompted questionnaire. Most patients that reported side effects in the unprompted questionnaire said they had just one adverse event, while most reported two or more side effects both in the unprompted and in the prompted questionnaires, most side effects were rated as mild or moderate. Interestingly, 31 (7.5%) subjects (pooling data from both sites together) graded their adverse events as severe in the prompted (2) - From those subjects who did not self- report a. (1) When assessing adverse events, the method of data collection may significantly affect the results. dverse events after using a triptan, most of them will report positively if presented with a list of side effects.
其他文献
采用美国G -P骨龄 (G -P法 )、中国骨龄(CHN法 )两种标准 ,分别对 3 3名青少年女子排球运动员进行了骨龄评判 ,并利用美国G -P图谱法 (G -P法 ) ,Tanner,Whitehouse的改进方
2008年11月12日,工业和信息化部发布了2008年电子信息百强企业榜,中兴通讯凭借一直坚持的高研发投入,列“研发投入比率”指标百强之首,综合实力亦一举跃居5强,排名第4。百强
A contributing factor to the failure of trials of neuroprotectants in acute ischemic stroke may be the differing vulnerability to ischemia of white compared wit
报告不典型肾结核31例并对此进行分析。对倒根据临床表现分为4类,即无痛性血尿者8例,反复尿频者15例,附睾结核者3例,肾积水者5例。无痛性血尿和阳睾结核者经抗结核治疗痊愈,反复尿
在符合题设条件要求的范围内,给定未知数一个确切的数值,把抽象的字母转化为具体的数字,通过分析、计算,从而确定问题解的情况,这就是我们所说的赋值法。对于一些几何问题,或
To be considered for resective (curative) surgery, most seizures have to been proved to arise exclusively from one area of the brain that is functionally sile n
要想上好语文复习课,提高复习效率,就应该整体把握教材,采取合适的复习形式,关注学生的自主发展,使学生通过主动参与、合作探究,达到对语文知识的深入把握和语文综合能力的提
Background In patients who present with clinically isolated syndromes suggesti ve of multiple sclerosis, interferon beta 1a is effective in delaying evolution t
<正> 所有制关系是社会最深层的经济关系,所有制结构是社会最基本的经济结构。正因为这样,国内外学者大都重视所有制问题的研究,对所有制的变革也很关心。那么,建国以来我国的所有制关系和所有制结构经历过一些什么变革,现在又是怎么一种情况呢?今后我国所有制改革的方向和依据是什么呢?所有制改革同其他方面的改革是怎样一种关系呢?今后我国的所有制结构的特征是什么呢?该书对这些问题做了有益的探讨。作为一本学术性专著,该书自然要讨论所有制的有关范畴,例如生产资料所有制,生活资料所有制,劳动力所有制,所有权、占
中国品牌应该清晰自己的愿景,为品牌插上联想的翅膀,赋予品牌强大的生命力,从而赢得公众的认同感31年前,靠20万元起家创业,从最初只能作外国电脑品牌代理商,如今却已将个人电