论文部分内容阅读
共同危险责任最具争议的问题之一是免责事由,我国《侵权责任法》第10条规定的共同危险行为免责事由是要确定具体的侵权行为人,不能确定具体侵权人的,行为人承担连带责任。笔者认为《侵权责任法》第10条对免责事由的规定有悖于共同危险行为规范之目的。《侵权责任法》第10条免责事由的设定过分以受害人利益为中心,而完全置危险行为人的处境和利益于不顾,使本无须承担责任的非致害人成为新的受害人,对非实际致害人有失公平,因此,对《侵权责任法》第十条的规定是否合理,进行探讨论证。
One of the most controversial issues of common risk responsibility is that of exemption. The exemption of common danger stipulated in Article 10 of Tort Liability Law of China is to determine the specific tortfeasor, can not determine the specific infringer, responsibility. In my opinion, the provisions of Article 10 of the Tort Liability Law go against the principle of common dangerous behaviors. Article 10 of the Tort Liability Act sets the excuse of excessive liability mainly on the interests of the victims and ignores the situation and interests of the perpetrators altogether so that the non-victim who does not have to assume responsibility becomes a new victim, It is unfair to the non-actual victim, therefore, whether the provisions of Article 10 of Tort Liability Law are reasonable or not is discussed and argued.