论文部分内容阅读
以案卷笔录为中心是我国刑事审判长期以来普遍存在的一种模式。在这种审判方式中案卷笔录被赋予天然的证据能力和优势的证明力,庭审沦为对案卷笔录的审查和确认程序,辩护的有效性和庭审的对抗性被大大削弱,法庭审判流于形式,裁判结论的形成依托于案卷笔录而非庭审过程。这一模式与庭审实质化的改革要求背道而驰,也是以审判为中心的司法改革面临的重大难题。因此,我们有必要借助改革的契机,汲取域外的先进经验,探索切合中国实际的刑事案卷笔录认定路径。
Focusing on case records and transcripts is a pattern that has long been a prevalent criminal trial in our country. In this mode of trial, the record of the case file is endowed with natural evidence power and strength of evidence to prove that the trial has become the examination and verification process of the case record. The validity of the defense and the adversarial nature of the court trial have been greatly weakened. The formation of the referee’s conclusion depends on the record of the case file rather than the trial process. This model runs counter to the substantial reform of the court trial and is also a major challenge to the judiciary reform centering on the trial. Therefore, it is necessary for us to take the opportunity of reform to learn from the advanced experience outside the country and explore ways of identifying the actual record of criminal cases in China.