论文部分内容阅读
荀勖校理群书,撰成《中经新簿》,既仿刘向,也有突破。改变六分法,将典籍总别为四大类,更符合文献发展的实际情况,在图书分类史上具有重大意义和影响。可惜这部目录学史上的创新之作久已散佚,从而留下一些疑问有待考察,如《中经新簿》是否有叙录,即成历史谜案。本文就此问题,勾稽有关资料,考得荀勖校书活动长达十馀年,且循刘向旧例而为校定之本撰写叙录,并非像一些论者所说的《中经新簿》只是简单地著录书名、卷数、作者而已。
Xun 勖 school collation book, written “in the new book”, both imitation Liu Xiang, there are breakthroughs. Changing the six-point method, the total number of books is divided into four categories, more in line with the actual situation of the development of the literature, in the history of the book classification has great significance and influence. Unfortunately, the history of innovation in this bibliography has long been lost, leaving some questions to be investigated. For example, whether the New Book in the Classics contains a narrative record constitutes a historical mystery. This article on this issue, absurdity of the relevant information, test Xunyi school book activities for more than 10 years, and according to the old example of Liu and school textbooks, not as some commentators said “Book of journals” is just simple To record the title, the number of volumes, the author only.