文学性确乎是导致当代文学理论一系列理论悖谬的逻辑核心,但是要注意,这仅仅是作为学科的文学理论或仅仅是针对文艺学的学科建构而言。实际上,关于文学和文学性的思考向来就不只是学科的思考,甚至最具影响力的思想从来就不是学科界域内的思想,例如中国古代的“文”的思考,海德格尔的诗性之思和鲍德里亚们对消费意识形态的思考。作为一个深受审美救世说之熏染且以之为无意识精神背景的人文知识分子,我总觉得对文学性及其在当代世界撒播的定义式的捕获是一种细枝末节的思考,一种似乎是纯技术性的 Literary nature is indeed the logical core that led to a series of theoretical absurdities in contemporary literary theory. However, it should be noted that this is merely a literary theory as a subject or merely a disciplinary construction aimed at literature and art. In fact, the thinking on literature and literature has always been more than the thinking of disciplines. Even the most influential ideas have never been thought within disciplinary boundaries. For example, in ancient China, the thinking of “writing”, Heidegger’s Poetic Thinking and Baudrillard ’s Thoughts on Consumer Ideology. As a humanistic intellectual deeply rooted in aesthetic salvation and as an unconscious spiritual background, I always feel that capturing literature and its definitional seance in the contemporary world is a minutiae, a seemingly pure Technical