我读《老友》有10多年了,以前重点是读《感悟》和《时事纵横》栏目,其他栏目只是略读,到了最后的《老友信箱》多半是忽略不读。如今我发现,忽略《老友信箱》是错误的,应纠正过来。最近,我翻出去年及今年已出版的《老友》,把《老友信箱》认真地读了一遍,以弥补损失。我认识到《老友信箱》是编者与读者互相沟通的桥梁。个人读《老友》不可能对每一个栏目都体会得很深刻,通过《老友 I read “old friend” for more than 10 years. In the past, I mainly read “Inspiration” and “Current Affairs and Vertical” columns. The rest of the columns were skimming only. At last, most of my “friend’s mailbox” was ignored. Now I have found that it is wrong to ignore “friend’s mailbox” and that it should be rectified. Recently, I turned to “old friends” who published last year and this year and read “Old Friends Mailbox” carefully to make up for the loss. I realize that “friend’s mailbox” is a bridge between editors and readers. Personal reading “old friend” can not have a profound understanding of each section, through the "old friend