康德在《纯粹理性批判》为了解决知识的客观有效性问题,提出“‘我思’必须能够伴随着我的一切表象”的命题。黑格尔很欣赏康德能够在知识论层面对“我思”概念重新展开思考,但是他不满足于康德的相关思考。他认为康德太保守、不彻底,没有对“我思”概念在存在论的层面展开思考和批判。黑格尔通过对康德“我思”概念的批判,提出用“概念”(Concept)来取代康德的“我思”概念,从而克服以往哲学对“我思”概念、范畴的表象式思维方式。 In the Critique of Pure Reason, Kant put forward the proposition that “I think” must be accompanied by all my appearances in order to solve the objective and effective question of knowledge. Hegel appreciates Kant’s rethinking of the concept of “I think” at the epistemological level, but he is not content with Kant’s thinking. He believes that Kant is too conservative and not thorough, without thinking and criticizing the notion of “I think” at the level of ontology. By criticizing the concept of Kant ’s “I think”, Hegel proposes to replace Kant’ s “I think” concept with “concept” so as to overcome the notion of “I think” , The category of representational thinking.