论文部分内容阅读
性贿赂成为职务犯罪的新动向,据统计,95％的落马者都有情妇。男人用职务的影响力来寻租,首先寻租的是钱,当租金攒成了巨额财富,一辈子用不完的时候,他下一个寻租的目标可能就是性,圣人说,饱暖思淫逸。在一些女人眼里,性是最安全的行贿方式,行与受就是一个过程,即使长期保持关系,也不留下一个看得见的东西。双方否定,就难以找到证据。男方利用职务之便给女方的东西,可以有蛛丝马迹,但很难认定赃物就是果,性交就是因,认定似乎比捉奸还难。性与生俱来,用完一次还有,属于可再生资源,只要还有一口气,性就不会消失。热爱物尽其用这个原则的女人,就要用它来以小博大,商者无域,何乐而不为? 我给你十头羊,你给我一头牛,这叫换;但是,我没有十头羊,只有性,我陪你十次,你给我一头牛,成交就算等价,这叫卖; 如果用一头牛来换性的那个人有一个职务,该职务却是通过选举或者任命而得,并非自封,而且如果没有那个职务的影响力, 他就弄不来那头牛,那么,这样的性交易就叫贿赂。性是快乐的,但并不是所有的快乐都是无罪的。男欢女爱如果破坏了“大官人”履行职务的公正,那么,该“娘子”的性就是有罪的,不管“官家”事后能否找到证据来证明那些曾经的风流。
Sexual bribery has become a new trend in job-related crimes. According to statistics, 95% of those who fall by the road have mistresses. Men use the influence of their positions to rent-seeking, first rent-seeking is money, when the rent saved into a huge amount of wealth, life can not be used up, his next rent-seeking target may be sex, the saint said, Yat. In the eyes of some women, sex is the safest way to pay bribes. It is a process of doing what is acceptable to a woman. Even if long-term relationships are maintained, there is no visible thing left behind. If both sides negate, it will be hard to find evidence. The man takes advantage of his position to give the woman something that can clues, but it is difficult to identify the stolen goods is fruit, because of sexual intercourse, finds that it seems harder than to catch rape. Sex born, exhausted once, belong to renewable resources, as long as the breath, sex will not disappear. Love the best use of this principle, the woman, it is necessary to use it to small business, business without domain, why not? I give you ten sheep, you give me a cow, called change; but I did not Ten sheep, only sex, I accompany you ten times, you give me a cow, even if the transaction is equivalent to selling; if a cow for sex have a job, the job is through election or appointment derived , Is not self-styled, and if not the influence of that position, he can not get the cow, then, such sex trade is called bribe. Sex is happy, but not all happiness is innocent. If the love of men and women destroys the impartiality of “Dignitaries” in performing their duties, then the nature of the “lady” is guilty, regardless of whether “official” can find evidence to prove those once romantic affair.