程老师遭遇的尴尬绝对不是个案,面对学生的公开质疑,教育者理应反躬自省:社会实践年年搞甚至月月搞,但实践内容、形式却雷打不动,缺乏创意,还经常重复。试问,这样的社会实践活动如何才能激发学生的热情?如果学生最终选择应付了事,那么,这样的活动对学生成长的意义究竟有多大?诚然,学校事先安排好实践内容,能使活动开展得比较顺利。而且,学校选择的社会实践内容,应该说都比较周全地考虑了学生的特点和实践的教育意义,同时具有较强 Cheng embarrassed teacher is definitely not the case, in the face of open questioning of students, educators should self-examination: Social practice every year or even the moon, but the practice content, the form was unshakeable, lack of creativity, but also often repeated. How can such social practice inspire students’ enthusiasm? If the students finally choose to deal with something, then what is the significance of such activities for the growth of students? It is true that the school arranges the practical contents in advance so that the activities can be carried out More smoothly. Moreover, the contents of the social practices chosen by the schools should be said that they all take more comprehensive consideration of the characteristics of students and the educational significance of practice,