论文部分内容阅读
从一般意义上说,调研与政务信息有着天然的内在联系.初级信息是进行调研的诱因,调研是初级信息质量优化的手段,这就决定了政务信息工作与调研工作应该而且必须是相互补充和相互结合的.但就一些省市的工作实践而言,政务信息工作与调研工作的结合却往往陷于一种矛盾的两难境地;这就需要我们正确认识政务信息调研的性质和任务特点,以利于探索信息工作与调研工作相结合最佳的实践运作方式.一、调研工作的认识误区和制约因素(1)对信息与调研结合的认识误区.目前,对信息与调研的结合,或对政务信息调研工作的开展,存在一种极端的认识,即把信息调研工作与政府调研机构的专门政策调研工作等同起来,认为只有后者才是真正的调研工作,也只有后者的调研模式才是信息调研工作可遵循的方式.实践证明,这种指导思想往往导致浪费人力、物力和时间,徒劳地和低品位地重复政府政策调研部门的工作,又影响和冲击了日常信息工作的开展,所得成果对领导决策也不一定有多大价值.
In a general sense, there is a natural internal relationship between research and government information.Primary information is the incentive to conduct research and research is the means of optimizing the quality of primary information, which determines that government information work and research work should and must complement each other and But in some provinces and cities in terms of work practices, the combination of government information work and research work is often caught in a contradiction dilemma; This requires that we correctly understand the nature of government information research and mission characteristics in order to facilitate Explore the combination of information and research work the best practice mode of operation I. Misunderstandings and constraints on research work (1) misunderstanding of the combination of information and research Currently, the combination of information and research, or on the government information Research work carried out, there is an extreme understanding of the information research work and government research agencies specialized policy research work together, that only the latter is the real research work, and only the latter research model is the information Research methods can be followed.Practice has proved that this guiding ideology often results in a waste of manpower, material and time, Repetitive and low-grade duplication of government policy research departments work, but also affect and impact the daily information work carried out, the results of the decision-making is not necessarily how much value leadership.