论文部分内容阅读
专利实质要件是指在专利审查或确权程序中对发明创造进行实质判断的条件,基于我国专利制度的二元体系结构,在专利侵权判定的司法实践中并不适用这些条款。行政程序与侵权处理程序的直接连接点仅在于权利效力,在禁止反悔原则和现有技术抗辩原则中行政程序的判断内容或规则可能会被侵权判断程序予以借鉴。就专利实质要件在权利要求解释中的作用,本文认为司法实践的发展趋势对于这些条款的引入应侧重在厘定发明实质、寻求最大合理化的权利要求解释方式与规则。
The essence of patent refers to the condition of substantive judgments of invention and creation in the procedure of patent examination or confirmation procedure. Based on the binary system structure of patent system in our country, these clauses are not applicable in the judicial practice of judging patent infringement. The direct connection between administrative procedure and infringement procedure lies only in the effect of rights. The judgments or rules of administrative procedure in the principle of no-return and prior-art defense may be borrowed from the judgment procedure of infringement. This paper argues that the trend of development of judicial practice for the introduction of these provisions should focus on determining the substance of the invention, seeking the most reasonable way to explain the rights requirements and rules.