论文部分内容阅读
目的:观察指钩法提取输卵管的临床效果。方法:本站2010年1月~2012年12月接待的行输卵管结扎术患者总计3000余例,仅有8例未能顺利完成手术,将随机抽取其中340例患者作为研究对象,其中对照组有150例采取吊钩法提取输卵管,研究组有190例采取指钩法提取输卵管,对两组取管的临床效果进行观察对比分析。结果:两组患者在取管时间、取管成功率与疼痛程度上皆有显著性差异(P<0.01),研究组明显优于对照组,有统计学意义;两组患者在术中术后不良反应发生率上并无显著性差异(P>0.05),无统计学意义。结论:对于输卵管结扎术患者采用指钩法提取输卵管,有着取管时间短、取管成功率高、疼痛程度轻等优势,值得临床借鉴。
Objective: To observe the clinical effect of finger hook extraction tubal. Methods: From January 2010 to December 2012, a total of more than 3000 cases of tubal ligation were received. Only 8 cases failed to complete the operation successfully, of which 340 cases were randomly selected as the study subjects, in which the control group had One hundred and fifty cases took the hook method to extract the fallopian tubes. In the study group, 190 cases took the hooking method to extract the fallopian tubes. The clinical effects of the two sets of tubes were observed and compared. Results: There were significant differences between the two groups in the time of taking the tube, the success rate of taking tube and the degree of pain (P <0.01), the study group was significantly better than the control group, with statistical significance; two groups of patients after surgery No significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions (P> 0.05), no statistical significance. Conclusions: Tubal ligation is the best method for tubal ligation in tubal ligation. It has the advantages of short taking tube time, high success rate of tube taking, and mild pain degree. It is worthy of clinical reference.