当一个门外汉问及法官如何断案的问题时,多数法官们的回答也许是“坐堂问案,适用法律”。“坐堂问案”主要是弄清事实,“适用法律”是法官根据法律．运用法律推理等方法作出判决的过程。本文只针对法官如何适用法律这一问题展开。法官素质如何,运用何种方法、何种依据解释法律,对判决结果影响至巨,其结果是对当事人的权益影响甚大,故此问题值得每一位法官作深入思考。本文将通过自己的司法实践对此问题谈点滴体会。 When an outsider asks about how a judge broke the case, the majority of the judges may answer “sit in the room and apply the law.” “Sitting in court asking case” is mainly to find out the facts, “applicable law” is a judge according to the law. Using legal reasoning and other methods to make the decision process. This article only addresses the issue of how judges apply the law. Judges how the quality of the use of what method, what basis to explain the law, the verdict on the verdict, the result is a great impact on the rights and interests of the parties, so the issue deserves every judge in-depth thinking. This article will talk about this issue through my own judicial practice.