论文部分内容阅读
本文报告242例电子胎儿监护的结果,从本组资料的分析中可以看出基线胎儿心率异常时,羊水粪染和新生儿评分≤7分者分别为64.~(52)％和19.~(250)％;而基线变异性异常时这两项指标分别为64.~(94)％和23.~(38)％。在NST中亦有相似情况。因此,基线胎儿心率和变异性两者在判断胎儿缺氧的价值上是相同的。 在173例NST,中反应型123例,其中假反应型6例(4.92％),无反应型24例,其中假无反应型9例(36％)。联合监护NST加上CST或OCT;电子监护加上胎儿血PH测定以及其它的检查,对于提高诊断符合率是有意义的。
This article reports the results of 242 cases of electronic fetal monitoring, from the analysis of this group of data can be seen at baseline fetal heart rate abnormalities, meconium amniotic fluid and neonatal score ≤ 7 points were 64. ~ (52)% and 19. ~ (250)% respectively; while the two indicators of abnormal baseline variability were 64.- (94)% and 23.- (38)% respectively. There is a similar situation in NST. Therefore, both the baseline fetal heart rate and variability are the same in judging fetal hypoxia. Of the 173 patients with NST, 123 were moderately reactive, including 6 (4.92%) false-negative and 24 nonresponsive (n = 9). Joint monitoring of NST plus CST or OCT; electronic monitoring with fetal blood PH and other tests, to improve diagnostic accuracy is significant.