我国文献情报标准化工作,从无到有,从小到大,至今已进入了一个新的发展阶段,达到了较高的水平。然而,为适应文献工作现代化、新技术领域的迫切需求,还应努力做到更先进、更科学、更合理、更适用。通过学习研究和编目实践,我们发现现行文献著录国家标准中还存在着某些非标准化的问题。如:在名词术语的表述上;在项目、格式等方面存在着释义不精确,行文欠妥,前后矛盾的现象。对于这些非标准化的问题,我们认为应该引起标准化技术委员会六分会的足够重视,并予以及时的完善,修订。 1.《文献著录总则》GB3792.1——83所称的“著录根据”,在《普通图书著录规则》GB The standardization of documentary information in our country has reached a new stage of development from scratch, from childhood to age, reaching a relatively high level. However, in order to meet the urgent needs of the modernization of literature work and new technologies, efforts should be made to be more advanced, more scientific, more reasonable and more applicable. Through the study and cataloging practice, we find that there are still some non-standardization problems in the existing national standards. Such as: in the terminology of the expression; in the project, format, etc. there is imprecision in interpretation, wording defects, inconsistent before and after the phenomenon. For these non-standardization issues, we think it should cause enough attention to the Sixth Committee of Standardization Technical Committee, and timely improvements, amendments. 1. “General Record of Literature” GB3792.1--83 referred to as “recorded basis” in the “General Bookkeeping Rules” GB