论文部分内容阅读
英国反马克思主义健将包勃尔的著作,本刊过去已有过介绍。这一期我们特从巴斯摩尔近著《哲学百年》中摘译了这篇介绍他的逻辑和方法论思想的文章,及包勃尔本人的一篇论科学“分界问题”的文章,以供国内学术界参考。在我们看来,科学的标准在于预测性和准确性(或具体性),而包勃尔的“可否定性”对“可证突性”之争只是口头上的争执,实际上是很难分得清楚的。不过预测性是在决定论的前提下提出来的,而包勃尔却是反对历史决定论最烈的人,当然要避免以预测性为科学的标准了。
The British anti-Marxism package Po’s book, the magazine has been introduced in the past. In this issue, we have specifically translated this article introducing his logic and methodology from his recent book, “A Century of Philosophy,” and Paul Buhl’s own essay on the issue of “demarcation of sciences” for domestic Academic reference. In our opinion, the standard of science is predictability and accuracy (or specificity), whereas Paul Poirot’s “negative” argument over “probabilistic” is merely a verbal dispute that is in fact very difficult to distinguish Clearly. However, predictability is based on the premise of decision-making, and Paul Boer is opposed to the greatest determinist of history, of course, to avoid the predictability of science as a standard.