论文部分内容阅读
农业补贴问题历来是多边贸易体制下最复杂、争议最大的核心问题之一。在WTO成立之后,《农业协定》和《补贴协定》构成了WTO成员间有关农业补贴权利和义务的最新法律架构。而上述两协定法律规则之间的关系,几乎是所有WTO农业补贴案件必然要面对和讨论的最关键问题之一。根据WTO争端解决实践,上述两协定应予协调解释,同时和累积地适用于农业补贴问题。本文将目前的争端解决实践和法理学说归纳为“特别法”、“冲突”方法和“冲突兼顾效果”三种观点,对如何“同时和累积适用”这一关键问题进行深入分析,并在此基础上阐释了具体案情中两个协定可能的适用关系。
The issue of agricultural subsidies has always been one of the most complex and controversial core issues under the MTS. After the establishment of WTO, “Agreement on Agriculture” and “Subsidy Agreement” constituted the latest legal framework among WTO members on the rights and obligations of agricultural subsidies. The relationship between the above two legal rules is almost one of the most crucial issues that all WTO WTO agricultural subsidy cases must face and discuss. According to the practice of WTO dispute settlement, the above two agreements should be interpreted in a coordinated manner and applied to the issue of agricultural subsidies at the same time and cumulatively. This paper summarizes the current practice of dispute settlement and jurisprudence as three concepts of “special law”, “conflict” method and “conflict and effect”, on how to apply “simultaneously and cumulatively” Key issues in-depth analysis, and on this basis to explain the specific case of the two agreements may be applicable relationship.