论文部分内容阅读
村民张某,以“最高标额”中标承包了村办35亩林场,并与村委会签订了为期5年的《林场承包合同》。但村民李某以村委会投标、中标决定不公正为理由提出异议,后经有关部门支持中途替换张某管理林场。张某遂向法院提起诉讼,人民法院受理了张某的起诉。经审理认为,张某与村委会签订的《林场承包合同》手续齐全,合同双方并无异议。李某以投标、中标决定不当为由进行阻挠,侵害了他人的合法权益,因此作出判决:第一,张某与村委会签订的《承包合同》有效,予以保护;第二,李某的行为给张某造成的经济损失,以李某在林场内种植的蔬菜西瓜等折价赔偿;第三,案件诉讼费,全部由李某承担。李某不服,向上一级人民法院提出上诉。
Villagers Zhang, “” the highest bid “won the bid to contract a village of 35 acres of forest farms, and the village committee signed a 5-year” forest contract. “ But the villagers Lee to bid for the village committee, won the bid to decide the injustice as a reason for objection, after the relevant departments to support the replacement of Zhang managed forest farms. Zhang then filed a lawsuit to the court, the people’s court accepted Zhang’s prosecution. After hearing that, Zhang and the village committee signed the ”forest contract contract“ procedures are complete, the two sides have no objection to the contract. Lee objected to bidding and won the bid, and infringed upon the legitimate rights and interests of others. Therefore, he made the verdict: First, Zhang and the village committee signed the ”contract" effective, to protect; second, Lee’s Zhang economic behavior caused by the loss of Lee to grow vegetables in the forest farms such as watermelon discount compensation; third case litigation costs, all borne by Lee. Li refused to appeal to the people’s court at a higher level.