论文部分内容阅读
目的:检验心理弹性量表简化版(10-item Connor-Davidson resilience scale，CD-RISC-10)在我国社区居民中的信效度。方法:通过多阶段分层抽样，采用CD-RISC-10、流调中心用抑郁自评量表(the center for epidemiological studies depression scale，CES-D)和凯斯勒心理困扰量表(10-item Kessler psychological distress scale，K10)对2 051名社区居民进行问卷调查。采用SPSS 22.0和AMOS 22.0对CD-RISC-10因素结构进行探索性与验证性因素分析；同时采用平行分析与最小平均偏相关方法重测量表因子结构。结果:CD-RISC-10的Cronbach α系数为0.94，分半系数为0.89；题总相关系数为0.74~0.81(均n P<0.01)；探索性因素分析提取了1个公因子，累计方差63.24%；验证性因素分析显示单因素模型的各项拟合指数良好(n χ2/n df＝4.596，CFI＝0.967，TLI＝0.973，RMSEA＝0.065)；心理弹性[(27.02±13.50)分]与抑郁[(9.75±5.24)分]、心理困扰[(19.23±6.37)分]均呈显著负相关(n r＝-0.32，-0.35，均n P<0.01)。n 结论:CD-RISC-10具有良好的信效度，使用简易方便，是测量社区居民心理弹性的有效工具。“,”Objective:To explore the reliability and validity of the 10-item Connor-Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC-10) in Chinese community-dwelling adults.Methods:Using multistage stratified sampling, totally 2 051 community-dwelling adults were selected and they were investigated by the 10-item Connor-Davidson resilience scale, the center for epidemiological studies depression scale (CES-D) and 10-item Kessler psychological distress scale (K10). The exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to evaluate the CD-RISC-10 by SPSS 22.0 and AMOS 22.0.A parallel analysis and Velicer\'s minimum average partial (MAP) test were also supplemented to confirm the EFA-derived structure of the scale.Results:The Cronbach α coefficient of the CD-RISC-10 was 0.94, and the Spearman-Brown reliability was 0.89.The total correlation of the questions ranged from 0.74 to 0.81 (all n P<0.01). The exploratory factor analysis retained its single dimension, which can explain 63.24% of the total variance.Confirmatory factor analysis revealed the single factor model fit data adequately (n χ2/n df=4.596, CFI=0.967, TLI=0.973, RMSEA=0.065). The resilience(27.02±13.50) was negatively correlated with depression(9.75±5.24) and psychological distress (19.23±6.37)(n r=-0.32, -0.35, both n P<0.01).n Conclusion:The CD-RISC-10 scale has acceptable reliability and validity, with using easily and conveniently.Therefore, it is an effective tool for measuring the resilience of the community-dwelling adults.