论文部分内容阅读
“姓社”“姓资”问题是一个独特的、颇带中国土味的问题。这个问題曾长期地困扰着改革者,束缚住改革者的手脚。人们不禁要问,提出“姓社”“姓资”问题的人,真的是要讨论什么是社会主义、什么是资本主义这一重大原则问题吗? 一般说,社会主义和资本主义是有严格区别的,就我国情况来说,国有企业和集体企业是社会主义的,私营企业和外商独资经营企业是资本主义的;按劳分配是社会主义的,按资分配是资本主义的;中外合资和合作经营的企业,既有社会主义成分又有资本主义成分等等。这里,无疑也存在“姓社”和
The problem of “surnames and surnames” and “surnames and capital” is a peculiar issue that is rather of Chinese soil. This problem has plagued the reformers for so long as to constrain the hands of the reformers. People can not but ask: Is it really necessary to discuss what is socialism and what is the major principle of capitalism when it comes to proposing the issue of “surname socialism” and “capitalization.” Generally speaking, socialism and capitalism are strict In the case of our country, state-owned enterprises and collective enterprises are socialist. Private-owned enterprises and wholly foreign-owned enterprises are capitalist. Distribution according to work is socialism and distribution according to capital is capitalism. Sino-foreign joint ventures and Cooperative enterprises, both the socialist component as well as capitalist components. Here, there is no doubt that there is “surname community” and