论文部分内容阅读
知识产权作为私权,具有排他性。同时知识本身又具有公共属性,公众有获取与使用知识的权利。为实现私益和公益的平衡,《保护工业产权巴黎公约》《伯尔尼保护文学和艺术作品公约》以及《与贸易有关的知识产权协定》等与知识产权有关的多边条约,以及成员国的国内立法均规定了平衡机制,如保护期、合理限制、例外或强制许可等。而TRIPS-plus协定对私权的倾斜保护,势必会打破私益和公益的平衡。
Intellectual property is exclusive and private. At the same time, knowledge itself has public attributes, and the public has the right to acquire and use knowledge. In order to achieve the balance between private benefits and public goods, the multilateral treaties on intellectual property such as the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works and the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, as well as the domestic legislation of member states Provides a balance of mechanisms, such as protection period, reasonable restrictions, exceptions or compulsory licensing. The TRIPS-plus agreement on the protection of private rights tilt, it will inevitably break the private and public welfare balance.