论文部分内容阅读
目的分析不同用药途径对治疗细菌性阴道病的临床疗效和缓解症状时间。方法对我院201 1年7月～201 2年6月门诊确诊为细菌性阴道病2 5 3例患者进行随机分组,口服用药组1 2 1例,局部冲洗上药组1 3 2例。结果口服用药组与局部冲洗上药组对治疗细菌性阴道病疗效差异无统计学意义(P>0.0 5);而局部冲洗上药组对细菌性阴道病的症状缓解时间明显短于口服用药组,且发生不良反应少。结论臭氧冲洗联合复方甲硝唑栓局部治疗细菌性阴道病是一种安全有效的方法。
Objective To analyze the clinical effects of different routes of administration on the treatment of bacterial vaginosis and the time to relieve the symptoms. Methods Twenty-five patients diagnosed as bacterial vaginosis in our hospital from July 2011 to June 2012 were randomly divided into oral administration group (121 cases) and local irrigation group (122 cases). Results There was no significant difference in therapeutic efficacy between oral drug group and local drug-wash group in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis (P> 0.0 5). However, the time to relieve the symptoms of bacterial vaginosis was significantly shorter in local drug-wash group than in oral drug group , And the occurrence of adverse reactions less. Conclusion Ozone irrigation combined with compound metronidazole suppositories for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis is a safe and effective method.