论文部分内容阅读
2003年9月29日《中国青年报》上有一篇报道,题目是《南开大一新生批判中学作文教学》。其中提到了徐雯锦先生《从2003年高考作文“情感与认知”思辨性话题作文考生应对无措谈起》一文,徐文指出:“2003年高考作文题在一定程度上冲破了往年作文题重表面论述、轻深层思辨的桎梏,但许多考生面对此题毫无头绪,胡扯一通。”徐先生认为,症结在于中学语文教学过于重知识、轻思想,“老师在对一些文言文讲解时只注意字词的表达,而最能够启迪读者的哲学思维构造却被忽视。好的文章要有文采,有文化底蕴,还要有哲学思辨贯串始终,而哲学思维结构要靠老师去引导”。
A report was published on the China Youth Daily on September 29, 2003. The topic was “Nankai Freshman Critique Middle School Composition Teaching.” Among them, Mr. Xu Wenjin mentioned the article “From the 2003 College Entrance Exam Essay ”Emotion and Cognition“ ”Dictionary Topic Composition Candidates Cope with Sorrow“, Xu Wen pointed out: ”The 2003 college entrance examination essay problem broke through to a certain extent in previous years. Essays focus on surface discussion, light and deep speculation, but many candidates have no clues on this topic and make a nonsense.” Mr. Xu believes that the crux of the problem is that Chinese teaching in middle schools is too knowledge and light thinking. When explaining classical Chinese, only the expression of the words is paid attention to, and the philosophical thinking structure that can most enlighten the reader is ignored.The good articles must have literary talent, cultural connotation, and philosophical reflection throughout, while the philosophical thinking structure depends on the teacher. guide".