论文部分内容阅读
转基因食品安全的敏感性和重要性是全球科技新闻关注的议题,在仍然存在粮食危机的中国更是如此。2012年,中美合作的“黄金大米”事件受到了国内外的广泛关注,成为持续时间内媒体报道的焦点。本文遴选国内报纸媒体和科学家网络博客对此事件的报道和评论文章进行比较研究。首先,分析结果显示“黄金大米”事件受到指责的主要原因是没有得到合理合法的知情同意以及违反了相关的法律法规。其次,从研究者参与黄金大米试验的研究动机入手追寻事件发生的原因和参与情况。最后,分析了黄金大米试验中科学和科学家的特性。这些结果折射了在科学试验过程中科学伦理和道德守则的重要性。在科学危机发生的过程中有效的科学传播可以化解危机给社会造成的危害。
The sensitivity and importance of genetically modified food safety is a topic of concern for the global science and technology news, especially in China, where the food crisis still exists. In 2012, the “Golden Rice” incident of Sino-U.S. Cooperation has drawn wide attention both at home and abroad and has become the focus of media coverage over the duration. This article selects the domestic newspaper media and the scientist network blog to make a comparative study on the coverage and commentary articles of this incident. First of all, the analysis shows that the main reason for being accused of the ’’ golden rice ’’ incident is the failure to obtain reasonable and legitimate informed consent and violate the relevant laws and regulations. Secondly, starting from the research motivation of the researchers involved in the gold rice test, we trace the cause and participation of the incident. Finally, the characteristics of science and scientists in gold rice testing are analyzed. These results reflect the importance of scientific ethics and ethics in the conduct of scientific experimentation. The effective dissemination of science in the wake of the scientific crisis can defuse the danger that the crisis poses to society.