论文部分内容阅读
1998年3月5日,曾某与杨某签订“共同协作安装赣南宾馆中央热水工程协议”。约定:四台机组安装,杨某投入资金2-3万元,到期全部工程结束,由曾某付给杨某报酬3万元(含工资、利息),其余费用由曾某承担。杨某投资从1998年9月付清(归还),报酬在1998年内兑付。如宾馆只安装一台机组,报酬按1万元计算。如违约超期,每月超加1千元整。协议签订当日,杨依约投入曾2万元,曾向杨出具了借条。因曾未在98年9月归还杨投入的2万元,杨起诉要曾偿还借款本息,法院判决:曾某偿还杨某借款2万元及利息。宣判后,双方服判,未上诉。1999年元月杨某再次起诉,请求判令曾某按协议约
March 5, 1998, Zengmou and Yang signed the “collaborative installation of Gannan Hotel Central Hot Water Engineering Agreement.” Convention: four units installed, Yang invested 2-3 million, all the project due to expire, Yang had paid Zengmou 30000 yuan (including wages, interest), and the remaining costs from Zengmou commitment. Yang’s investment was paid off (returned) in September 1998, and remuneration was redeemed in 1998. If the hotel only installs a unit, according to 10,000 yuan calculation. If the default extended, super plus 1 thousand yuan a month. The agreement was signed the same day, Yang had invested about 20,000 yuan, Yang had issued a IOU. Because in September 98 has not yet returned Yang invested 20,000 yuan, Yang sued to repay the loan principal and interest, the court ruled: Zengmou Yang borrowed 20,000 yuan and interest. After the verdict, the two parties served their sentence and did not appeal. In January 1999, Yang once again sued, requesting an order by Zengmou agreement