论文部分内容阅读
法官话语规范化运动在司法实践中表现为对法律话语和普通话的推崇,但却因此引发了严重的沟通不协问题。通过对中级法院和基层法院两级法院法官进行问卷调查和实地访谈获取的数据进行汇总分析发现,法官在司法活动中遇到的沟通问题,包括方言与普通话的翻译和术语与社会话语的转换两个方面。法官一律采用法律话语和普通话或者社会话语和方言,抑或对于每句话都用后者复述前者,都将抵消一部分语言的沟通效用,而原则上使用法律话语和普通话,在受众听不懂时,根据语境的差异对法官话语进行转化和翻译,则可以实现沟通效用的最大化。
Judicial discourse normalization movement in judicial practice showed respect for legal discourse and mandarin, but it has led to serious problems of communication problems. Through the analysis of the data obtained from the questionnaire surveys and field interviews conducted by the judges of the intermediate courts and the grassroots courts, it is found that the communication problems encountered by judges in judicial activities include the translation of dialects and mandarins and the conversion of terminology and social discourse Aspects. Judges should adopt legal discourse and Putonghua or social discourse and dialect, or repeat the former with the latter for each sentence, which will offset part of the communicative effect of the language. In principle, legal discourse and Putonghua are used. When the audience do not understand, Transforming and translating judges’ discourses according to contextual differences can maximize the communication utility.