四、放马滩“纸质地图”质疑 《中国科学报》1989年5月5日报道中提到的“有力证据”是甘肃天水放马滩汉墓出土的一张“纸地图”,笔者读了《文物》杂志上的发掘报告之后,对此提出几点疑问。 (一) 汉墓没有文字可为断代依据,两汉墓制葬俗基本相同,同样可能为东汉之墓。 据报道:放马滩墓地总面积11000多平方米,墓葬100余座,均分布在秦岭山前平地,依东西分上中下三层排列,这次发掘14座,其中秦墓13座,散布在西面;汉墓1座单独在东面,与西面秦墓有相当远的一段距离, Fourth, put the “map of the paper” questioned the “China Science” reported in May 5, 1989 report of “strong evidence” is a Tanshui Maanshan Han Tomb unearthed a “paper map”, the author read After the excavation report on Heritage, I raised a few questions about it. (A) there is no text in the Han tomb can be based on the dating, burial customs of the two Han Dynasty is basically the same, may also be the tomb of the Eastern Han Dynasty. According to reports: Ma Maotian put a total area of ​​more than 11,000 square meters, more than 100 tombs, are located in the Qinling Mountains Piedmont, according to east and west points on the arrangement of the middle and lower three, the excavation of 14, of which 13 tomb Qin, scattered In the west; Han Tomb 1 alone in the east, with the west Qin Tombs have a considerable distance,