论文部分内容阅读
【裁判要旨】计算机软件侵权纠纷中,权利人举证难是比较普遍的问题。利用telnet程序命令获取被告服务器的软件信息,是当事人在公证取证和法院证据保全之外取得对方软件侵权证据的又一种尝试。对于该类侵权证据,不能简单予以肯定或否定,应当结合案情,对证据的“三性”进行分析,适当分配举证责任,并根据证明程度的推进转移举证责任,最终认定该证据是否足以证明被告构成软件侵权。
Referee motto Computer software infringement disputes, the rightholder is difficult to prove the more common issue. Using the telnet program command to obtain the defendant server’s software information is another attempt of the parties to obtain the evidence of the other party’s software infringement in addition to the notarization and the preservation of the court’s evidence. The evidence of such infringement can not be affirmed or denied simply. It should analyze the “three nature” of the evidence in accordance with the merits, allocate the burden of proof as appropriate and transfer the burden of proof according to the degree of the proof, and finally determine whether the evidence is sufficient Proof of the defendant constitutes a software infringement.