论文部分内容阅读
目的:通过对北京市科学技术奖励中医、西医类项目的比较分析,探讨北京市科学技术奖励中医类项目的具体情况,为中医药的科技组织管理工作提供借鉴,也为中医药科研工作者提供研究方向的相关思路。方法:收集2004—2013年北京市科学技术奖励一、二、三等奖医学类项目数据,运用统计学分析方法进行比较分析。结果:西医类获奖项目数量是中医类的3倍之多;西医类在内科学、药学、肿瘤学及外科学研究较多,中医类在中药学、中医内科及中医临床学研究较多;西医类项目的研究单位层次广,力量强,中医类项目研究单位较为单一。结论:(1)中医类科技奖励项目的数量及级别有待提高;(2)中医药肿瘤学研究的科技成果有待突破;(3)多层次的中医药研究主体有待拓展与完善。
OBJECTIVE: To compare the Beijing-based science and technology award TCM and western medicine projects to explore the specific conditions of Beijing science and technology reward TCM projects, to provide reference for the scientific and technological organizations and management of TCM, and also to provide TCM research workers with Research ideas related ideas. Methods: The data of the first, second and third place medical science projects of Beijing Science and Technology Award 2004 to 2013 were collected and compared with the statistical analysis methods. Results: The number of western medicine awards was three times as much as that of traditional Chinese medicine. Western medicine was more studied in internal medicine, pharmacy, oncology and surgery. Chinese medicine was more studied in traditional Chinese medicine, traditional Chinese medicine and Chinese medicine. Western medicine The research units of the category project have a wide range of levels and strong forces, and the research units of Chinese medicine are more single. Conclusions: (1) The number and level of science and technology rewards projects in TCM need to be improved; (2) the scientific and technological achievements in TCM oncology need to be broken; and (3) the research subjects of TCM at multiple levels need to be expanded and perfected.