最近听了一些老师执教的苏教版教材《揠苗助长》、《鹬蚌相争》(第六册)、《自相矛盾》、《滥竽充数》(第九册)等课文的教学,发现老师对这些课文存在模糊的认识,认为前两篇是寓言故事,后两篇是成语故事,教学的内容和要求应该不同,不同在哪里,又说不 Recently, I listened to the teaching of some teaching materials taught by teachers, such as “Sui Miao Zhu Chang Long”, “Snort and Clam Contention” (Book 6), “Self-contradictory” and “Excuse me” (Book 9) There is a vague awareness of the text, that the first two are allegory stories, the latter two are idioms, teaching content and requirements should be different, where different, say no