论文部分内容阅读
本文作者因审理“五谷道场”破产重整案,引发了法官在破产重整程序中的角色定位问题的思考。文章第一部分作者通过对新旧破产法的对比研究,得出新破产法框架下法官角色定位发生了变化的结论。文章第二部分分析了启动原因多元、启动主体多元、重整措施多样、参与主体多元、担保物权受限、重整目的多重等破产重整程序的特征,由于破产重整制度上述在目的、措施、参与主体等方面的特征,使得法官在重整程序中仅仅进行消极的程序指挥和监督是远远不够的,在各方利益冲突时,法官还需要协调和衡平裁决,当然也不能过度参与,越俎代庖。文章的第三部分指出了审理破产重整案件的法官在重整程序中担当着指挥员、监督员、裁判员和协调员的角色,这四个角色中指挥员、监督员和裁判员的角色是法律所规定法官担当的角色,而协调员的角色是重整的参与主体多元、涉及利益主体较多、重整的社会公益目的较强的特征,使得作为国家机关的法院不能消极被动地旁观,而必须进行必要的协调的要求。
The author of this article aroused the consideration of the role of judges in the bankruptcy reorganization process because of the trial of the bankruptcy and reorganization case of Grain Valley. The first part of the article through the comparative study of the old and the new bankruptcy law, draws the conclusion that the judge’s role orientation has changed under the new bankruptcy law. The second part of the article analyzes the characteristics of various bankruptcy reorganization procedures such as diversified start-ups, diversified start-up entities, diversified reorganization measures, multiple participations, limited warranty rights and multiple purposes of reorganization. As the bankruptcy reorganization system is above its purpose, Measures, the main body of the participants and other characteristics of the judge in the reorganization process so that judges only negative procedural command and supervision is not enough, the interests of all parties in conflict, the judge also need to coordinate and equalize the award, of course, can not be over-participation , The more 俎 generation 庖. The third part of the article points out the role of judges in cases of bankruptcy and reorganization as commanders, supervisors, referees and coordinators in the reorganization proceedings. The roles of commanders, supervisors and referees in these four roles Is the judge’s role as prescribed by law, and the coordinator’s role is that the participants involved in the reorganization are pluralistic in nature and involve the characteristics of a large number of stakeholders and the purpose of social welfare reorganization, so that courts as state organs can not passively and passively observe , And must make the necessary coordination requirements.