论文部分内容阅读
罗素认为马克思的理论没有条理,因为不符合数理逻辑。但列宁却说马克思的理论极其彻底而严整1。这两位二十世纪极具影响力的思想家对马克思的理论看法如此大相径庭,我们究竟相信谁呢?自上世纪下半叶开始,当代的一些经济学家们陆续证明了马克思的经济学原理是符合数理逻辑的。那么马克思还有经济基础变化必然会引发上层建筑变化的理论,这个理论是否也合乎数理逻辑呢?这正是本文要研究的问题。
Russell thought that Marx’s theory was unorganized because it did not conform to mathematical logic. But Lenin said that Marx’s theory is extremely thorough and complete. Since the second half of the last century, some economists of the contemporary world have successively proved that Marx’s economic principle is that the Marxist theory of economics is very different from that of the two twentieth century influential thinkers. In line with mathematical logic. Then there is a Marxist theory that the change of economic base will inevitably lead to the superstructure change. Is this theory in line with mathematical logic? That is exactly the question to be studied in this article.