论文部分内容阅读
传统的期刊分类工作程序雷同于图书(此处指的是狭义的图书)分类工作的程序。然而,期刊毕竟是一种连续出版物。连续出版、一种多册是它的基本特点。期刊的分类若能注意到这个基本特点,对其传统的分类工作程序做些适当改进,期刊分类工作效率的提高往往是意想不到的。那么,究竟如何改进才能提高工效呢?对此,我们进行了探讨和试验,并进行了比较和分析。我们认为,在原有工作程序的基础上,再补充上两道程序:①根据“基本大类”粗划分;②相同刊名者集中。这样,期刊分类的工作程序将会得到进一步的完善,期刊分类工作的效率就可以提高。
The traditional journal classification process is the same as the classification of books (in this case, narrowly defined books). However, journals are, after all, a serial publication. Continuous publishing, a book is its basic features. If we can notice the basic characteristics of the periodicals classification, we should make some improvements to the traditional classification work procedure, and the improvement of the efficiency of the periodical classification work is often unexpected. So, how to improve the efficiency of it? In this regard, we conducted a discussion and experimentation, and compared and analyzed. In our opinion, based on the original working procedures, two procedures should be added: ① coarse division according to “basic general categories”; ② concentration of the same journalists. In this way, the working procedures of journal classification will be further improved, and the efficiency of journal classification can be improved.