论文部分内容阅读
目的比较全自动清洗消毒机与家用洗衣机清洗复用止血带的清洗效果。方法将临床科室使用后的800根污染止血带随机分为两组,对照组用全自动清洗消毒机清洗,观察组用家用洗衣机清洗后使用含氯消毒液消毒,比较两种清洗消毒方法清洗时间、清洗质量及细菌监测结果。结果对照组清洗(70.4±3.6)min,合格率为96.0%;观察组清洗时间为(61.6±4.6)min,合格率为99.0%。从两组中随机抽取20根止血带作细菌和霉菌培养,均无细菌及霉菌生长。结论采用家用洗衣机清洗复用止血带与使用清洗消毒机效果一致,可保证清洗效果,省时省力,又可节约成本。
Objective To compare the cleaning effect of automatic tourniquet and home-use washing machine with tourniquet. Methods 800 contaminated tourniquets in clinical departments were randomly divided into two groups. The control group was cleaned with automatic cleaning and disinfecting machine. The observation group was disinfected with chlorine disinfectant after cleaning with household washing machine. The two cleaning and disinfecting methods were compared , Cleaning quality and bacterial monitoring results. Results The control group was cleaned (70.4 ± 3.6) min with a pass rate of 96.0%. The observation group had a wash time of (61.6 ± 4.6) min with a pass rate of 99.0%. Twenty hemostatic zones were randomly selected from both groups for bacterial and fungal growth without bacterial and mold growth. Conclusions The home-use washing machine cleaning reuse tourniquet is consistent with the use of cleaning and disinfecting machine to ensure the cleaning effect, saving time and labor and saving costs.