论文部分内容阅读
修改后的《公司法》对转让股权的股东身份未作区别,是一个缺陷。对自兼董事、监事的股东的控股股东,其股权的对外转让不应使用“过半数”,而应获得四分之三以上的股东甚至全体股东的同意;股权转让中“同等条件”的转让价格,一方面采用单一的股权转让价格,即采用综合评估与协商确定转让价格,另一方面赋予其他的股东异议权,认为价格不合理,可申请鉴定或者直接诉诸法院。
The amended “Company Law” does not distinguish between the shareholders of the transfer of ownership, is a flaw. For the self-serving directors and supervisors, the controlling shareholder of the shareholder should not use “more than half” of the equity transfer but should obtain the consent of more than three-fourths or even all the shareholders; the transfer of “equal conditions” in the equity transfer Price, on the one hand, a single equity transfer price, that is, the use of a comprehensive assessment and negotiation to determine the transfer price, on the other hand, to give other shareholders the right to dispute, that the price is not reasonable, you can apply for accreditation or directly resort to court.