当代儒林究竟有多少‘假”,有些什么“假”,我并不清楚。好在见题即可明义,这意思读者大致比我更清楚。例如,学位、职称、论文、专著、文集、创造发明、各种设计……等,其中并不是没有这个问题的。现在打假只打商品,其实事情远不是如此。不过,现在动不动就要打官司,你就举出了确凿的事实,“捉刀人”还得被迫出来否认的,我何必去做这种傻事呢?学者中也有人大干此事,“殷鉴不远,在夏后之氏”,眼睛一闭,总会有人出面揭穿西洋镜的。图名于一时,挨骂于百世,有的人就是 It is not clear to me how many “fake” or “fake” contemporary Confucianism really is, and it is better to express the meaning of the question, which means that the reader is generally clearer than I. For example, a degree, a title, an essay, a monograph, a collection of essays Creating inventions and designing various kinds of designs, etc. This is not without this problem. Now that the crackdown is on the fight for goods, things are far from the same. However, at present, we have to make a lawsuit and you have given a conclusive account of the fact that “ Catch the knife ”had to be forced out to deny, why should I do this stupid thing? Some scholars have done this thing,“ Yin Kam not far behind in the summer’s, ”eyes closed, there will always be exposed The name of the figure at a time, was scolded at Best, some people are