经常听到有人或用调侃的语气,或用讽刺的口吻,或用不满的言词在评价单位的领导:“又在搞平衡了。”意思说该领导在处理问题时左顾右盼,照顾方方面面,进而认为他们不主持公道,没有原则性。但是,尽管群众有意见,这种方法还是在领导工作中经常出现。那么,我们究竟应当怎样认识“搞平衡”这个问题呢? 应当看到,群众的批评有其正确的一面。事物发展的不平衡性,决定了我们在处理问题、表彰先进、选拔典型等项工作时,不能人为地搞平衡。若是不顾实际情况如何,只是从主观意图出发搞平衡,评先进一个单位一个,不管单位成绩如何,个人事迹怎样;搞奖励一人一份,不管贡献大小,成绩好坏;实在不行,名额有限,就轮流坐庄,先来后到;解决问题时也是一家一个,不多不少。这 Often heard someone or in a ridicule tone, or ironically tone, or dissatisfied with the words in the evaluation unit’s leadership: “and in a balance.” That the leadership in dealing with the problem left and right, take care of all aspects, and then think They are not just and do not have principle. However, in spite of the opinions of the masses, this method often occurs in the leadership work. So how exactly should we understand the issue of “balancing”? It should be noted that mass criticism has its right side. The unbalanced development of things determines that we can not artificially strike a balance when dealing with problems, honoring advanced work, and selecting typical work. Regardless of the actual situation, it is only based on the subjective intent to strike a balance. One advanced unit is evaluated. Regardless of the unit’s accomplishments, what are the individual deeds? One reward per person, regardless of the size of contribution, is not good or bad. Take turns taking turns, first to later; to solve the problem is one by one, not less. This