论文部分内容阅读
文学史本体论反思，包含着文学史认识的特殊性、方法论及价值学问题。文学史观与一般史观有着明显的区分。相比于一般历史，历时性并不是文学史的最重要属性，文学的历史并不抽象地存在于共性（合目的性）之中，抽干历史具体性的历史共性的真实性应该受到质疑。文学的历史首先应该理解为“美的历史”，其次才是“真的历史”和“善的历史”。它不是描述的，而是反思的；不是为了确认历史的实用意义，而是为了使文学审美的历史意义得以确立或当代化。也正因此，它同时也是对文学史话语的多义性的确立。
The ontological reflection of literary history contains the particularity, methodology and value problems of understanding of literary history. There is a clear distinction between the literary history view and the general history view. Compared with the general history, diachronicity is not the most important attribute of the history of literature. The history of literature does not abstractly exist in the generality (purposiveness). The authenticity of the historical commonality that drains the historical specificity should be questioned. The history of literature should first be understood as “the history of the United States,” followed by “real history” and “good history.” It is not a description, but a reflection; not to confirm the practical significance of history, but to establish or modernize the historical meaning of literary aesthetics. Therefore, it is also the establishment of the polysemy of the literary history discourse.