论文部分内容阅读
噶尔丹定性问题的症结点凸显在是否与沙俄勾结是否背叛清朝方面,并由此成为目前准噶尔史研究中的一个难点,虽然在上世纪80年代后有很多论文对噶尔丹做了相对客观地评价,但新材料问世少旧材料的挖掘又遇到逻辑上的悖论而研究工作突破不大。本文将噶尔丹置身于十七世纪欧亚大陆社会转型的潮流中分析他的行为,并对民族历史人物定性的标准从哲学、逻辑学、政治学、法律学、政治学、民族理论等学科的角度综合再认识,以期为噶尔丹定性问题提供一些研究思路。
The crux of the Galdan’s qualitative problem highlights whether the collusion with Czarist Russia betrayed the Qing Dynasty, and thus became a difficult point in the research of the history of the Junggar. Although many papers on the Galdan made a relatively objective after the 1980s Evaluation, but the advent of new materials mining of old materials and then encountered a logical paradox of breakthroughs in research work is not. This article analyzes Galdan’s personal behavior in the trend of social transformation in Eurasia in the seventeenth century. From the perspective of philosophy, logic, politics, law, politics and ethnology, Comprehensive understanding of the point of view, with a view to providing some research ideas Galdan qualitative problems.