论文部分内容阅读
目的对比分析白带常规镜检法、细菌预成酶谱分析法及联合法对5种常见下生殖道感染鉴别诊断的有效率。方法分别采用白带常规镜检法、细菌预成酶谱分析法对来我院就诊的3420例患者的阴道分泌物进行检测。结果采用白带常规镜检检出阴道感染患者1 636例,其中BV患者543例、VVC患者820例、TV患者225例、CV患者48例;采用细菌预成酶谱分析法检出阴道感染患者1 078例,其中AV患者461例、BV患者617例;采用联合法检出阴道感染患者2 171例,其中AV患者461例、BV患者617例、CV患者48例、TV患者225例、VVC患者820例。结论联合法集白带常规镜检法和细菌预成酶谱分析法的优点与一体,能够鉴别诊断5种常见下生殖道感染。
OBJECTIVE: To compare and analyze the effectiveness of routine leucorrhea microscopy, bacterial prebiotic zymography and combined methods in the differential diagnosis of five common lower genital infections. Methods The vaginal secretions of 3420 patients who came to our hospital were detected by routine leucorrhea microscopy and bacterial prebiotic zymography, respectively. Results A total of 1 366 vaginal infections were detected by leucorrhea, of which 543 were BV patients, 820 were VVC patients, 225 were TV patients and 48 were CV patients. The bacterial pre-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay 078 cases, including 461 cases of AV patients and 617 cases of BV patients; 2171 cases of vaginal infections were detected by the combination method, including 461 cases of AV patients, 617 cases of BV patients, 48 cases of CV patients, 225 cases of TV patients, 820 cases of VVC example. Conclusion The combined method of leucorrhea by conventional microscopy and bacterial prebiotic zymography analysis of the advantages and integration, can differentiate the diagnosis of five common lower genital tract infections.