关于“文学”的历史记意,必定影响作家的当下写作。在此意义上,重写文学史,不可避免地介入了当代文学进程。在二十世纪初正式引入“文学史”的教学与撰述之前,中国文人并没有认真区别文学理论、文学批秤与文学史的必要。几乎所有的文论,都是三位一体。这么一来,提倡文学革命与重写文学史,往往合而为一,比如,标榜“秦汉文章”,或者推崇“八代之文”,都既是“论”,也是“史”;既指向往昔,也涉及当下。即便以引进西方文化为主要特征的“五四”新文化运 The historical record of “literature” will certainly affect the writer’s current writing. In this sense, rewriting the history of literature inevitably intervenes in the process of contemporary literature. Before the formal introduction of the teaching and writing of “Literary History” in the early twentieth century, Chinese literati did not make a serious distinction between literary theory, literary criticism and literary history. Almost all literary theory, are Trinity. In this way, advocating the literary revolution and rewriting the history of literature are often combined into one. For example, the publication of the “Qin and Han articles” or the promotion of the “Eight Dynasties Articles” are both “theory” and “history”; both refer to the past, Also involved in the moment. Even the new “May Fourth” cultural movement featuring the introduction of Western culture as the main feature