在元代医家丹溪翁著的《格致余论·序》(以下简称《序》)中,曾先后两次出现了“震昌”一词。这本是作者的自称,然该书的点注者毛俊同同志却将“震昌”中的“昌”注为“正当”的“当”,使“震昌”变成了“震当”。这是个难以令人信服的注释。 首先,点注者并没有从版本学上拿出任何有说服力的根据。既然在现存的古本“序” In the Yuan Dynasty doctor Danxi Weng’s “lattice Yuyu theory” (hereinafter referred to as “preface”), there have been twice the word “Zhenchang.” This is the author’s self-proclamation. However, comrade Mao Jun-tong, the punctuator of the book, noted Chang in Zhichang as a legitimate agent and turned Zhen Chang into a shock “. This is an unbelievable comment. First, note writers do not come up with any convincing basis for versioning. Since the existing ancient ”preface"