日前到企业调研,某单位经营者对我诉说苦恼:该企业效益平平,近年一直靠“输血”过日子。为了寻找出路,他们准备加大改制力度。于是,派出了四个小组分别向同行中的改革先行者、佼佼者问计。结果,四组都根据同行经验,分别提出了置换产权、股份合作制、兼并破产、国有民营四种改革模式。四种改革形式,各有千秋,竟让经营者不知如何是好。选来选去,比上比下,还是拿不定主意,干脆来个暂时不改。结果,企业绩效如故,碌碌无为,步履 A few days ago to the enterprise research, a unit operator told me distressed: the average efficiency of the enterprise, has been relying on “blood transfusion” live in recent years. In order to find a way out, they are prepared to step up restructuring efforts. As a result, four teams were sent to each of their peers to reform the pioneer, leader asked. As a result, each of the four groups proposed four reform modes: replacement of property rights, joint-stock cooperative system, merger and bankruptcy, and state-owned private ownership, respectively, based on their peers' experiences. Four forms of reform, each having its own strengths and weaknesses, did not let the operator know how to do well. Selected to choose to go, than the ratio, or undecided, simply to change temporarily. Results, corporate performance as before, mediocre, walking