论文部分内容阅读
【案情】申请人:郭某,女,济宁市某学校教师被申请人:济宁市某学校案由:履行聘用合同2003年4月以后,被申请人多次要求申请人按照市房改规定退还由其居住的产权属于被申请人的住房,并提出了处理该问题的具体意见,但申请人一直未将住房退还。被申请人经请示上级主管部门,决定自2005年10月起扣发申请人工资福利,直到2006年9月。申请人认为被申请人扣发其工资及相关福利的行为没有法律政策依据,严重侵犯了自己的合法
[Case] Applicant: Guo, female, a school teacher in Jining City Respondent: Jining City, a school Case: fulfill the contract of employment After April 2003, the respondent has repeatedly asked the applicant in accordance with the provisions of the municipal housing reform returned by its The property of residence belonged to the respondent's housing and put forward specific opinions on handling the issue, but the applicant never returned the housing. After the respondent consulted the higher authorities, the claimant decided to deduct the wage and welfare of the applicant from October 2005 until September 2006. The claimant held that the respondent's withholding of the wages and related benefits did not have legal and policy basis and seriously violated its own legal