论文部分内容阅读
作为客观现象的口供依赖在中国刑事司法实践中成为诸多问题之源。历次修法虽努力改进,却一直未能走出治理模式固化、治理策略悖反、治理心态矛盾的困境。本文立足于对口供依赖进行功能分析、文化解释以及现实考量的多维解说,从法官角度展开再阐释,作为身体治理与思想治理媒介的口供,在慰藉心理、规避责任的背后,更重要的功能在于补强刑事裁判合法性。刑事裁判合法性重塑与口供治理的推进,将会改变既有治理主体与被治理者的关联方式,对现行封闭式刑事司法治理模式产生冲击,进而促进刑事司法治理发生转型。
Confession as an objective phenomenon has become a source of many problems in the practice of criminal justice in China. Although the previous revision of the law tried hard to improve, it failed to get out of the dilemma of curing the governance model, contradicting the governance tactics and resolving contradictions in the state of mind. Based on the multidimensional explanation of functional analysis, cultural interpretation and realistic consideration of oral dependence, this article re-interprets from the angle of judge as the basis of body governance and ideological governance. The more important function lies behind the comfort of mind and the avoidance of responsibility Reinforce the Legality of Criminal Referee. The remodeling of criminal referees legitimacy and confession governance will change the way of association between the existing governing body and the supervised, impact the current closed criminal justice governance mode, and then promote the transition of criminal justice governance.